What is more important for a country their military or economy?

In my opinion military. A nation could have a ton of riches but if they don't have a military another nation can just come in and take it all.What is more important for a country their military or economy?You could probably make it by with either as long as you played your cards right. For instance, there have been societies who have had a weak military but have a strong economic structure and societies that started with very little more than a strong military and carved out a place for themselves.



Generally, it's hard to have an operating military without the economy and vice a versa.



It seems to me that a nation that is purely military-based would used that military to build a stronger economy (This was one of the goals the Nazi's used as propaganda in WW2)



Societies that are purely military based usually have to build up a strong economy at some point in time, lest they run out of ways to fund their assaults. Eventually they'd have to have something to pay the costs of war with or they'd run themselves into the ground.



Societies with weaker armed forces survive by not stepping on the toes of the bigger guys and trading with everyone (Historically: the Dutch, Swiss and Italian States)



Usually however, these nations don't make the decisions on a global scale and the second they get in the way of a stronger power the only hope they have is for their allies to help them out or else they have to give up whatever economic dominion they own.



Generally, the goal is to use your strengths to build up your weaknesses and become the "jack of all trades." That's generally how most world powers attain that status.



To sum things up: It's hard to support a strong military without a strong economy. But it's hard to have a strong economy when you're constantly at war (using up the military).



I think in that sense, having something to offer economically may be more important - so long as you have friends in high places (and there have been cases throughout history of a strong economic power and a strong military power working together to build up one-another.)What is more important for a country their military or economy?
I'd say economy. If the people are starving in the streets, what is there to defend?



Besides, armies don't pay for themselves.What is more important for a country their military or economy?The military depends on the economy.
One supports the other. Without a military another country can take you over. Without an economy there isn't much for a military to fight for.What is more important for a country their military or economy?Economy.



With out a resourceful economy we couldn't have a strong national defense.What is more important for a country their military or economy?
You can not have an effective military with no economy behind it. We could not afford the guns, the personnel, the machines, the electronics, the food, the clothing, the boots, the training, the medicine, and more.
Without an economy you cannot have a military.What is more important for a country their military or economy?
Economy. The Military, and every other service that is monopolized with coerced payments, are unimportant.



If something is necessary, people will pay for it voluntarily.
They go hand in hand. A strong economy and weak military makes you a target for outside aggression, a strong military and no economy puts a huge burden on the finances and makes you an impoverished nation.
The United States spends more on the military than any other country in the world. Without an economy how do you plan on paying that?

Bush's military budget was 495 BILLION for 2008.

Two bombers crashed last year one was $1.4 BILLION the other was 283 MILLION. I don't think bake sales and tax breaks will generate that kind of cash.

But what do I know? I'm just a finance guy.



On the liberal front how many checkups could $1.683 BILLION get? Currently the scrap value of metal is about 20 cents a pound. Out of curiosity what do those bombers weigh?